<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0"><channel><title>da.vidr.cc - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-d6aa7564" type="application/json" /><link>http://davidar.disqus.com/</link><description /><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:46:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/DavidRobertsComments" /><feedburner:info uri="davidrobertscomments" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><item><title>Re: Open source Photosynth: PixelStruct 0.2 released</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/SsFoxPMyhas/</link><description>Compilation instructions are included in the README file. However, it sounds like you're running Windows, so unfortunately I can't help with any details specific to your platform. Instructions for running CMake can be found at [1].&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[1] &lt;a href="http://cmake.org/cmake/help/runningcmake.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://cmake.org/cmake/help/runningcmake.html&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:46:39 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/2009/09/18/open-source-photosynth-pixelstruct-02-released/#comment-63825170</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: iCCsh</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/4JxTetjEJrc/</link><description>Thanks, I hadn't come across that. However, note that this project is just meant to be a simple interface to an existing C Compiler rather than an interpreted variant of C.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 20:24:21 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/iccsh/#comment-63621817</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: iCCsh</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/iHzcrNzMgU8/</link><description>Interesting project. Note that the High energy physics guys have been doing this (embedding an interpreted version of C/C++) in an analysis package called ROOT from CERN.  They use a CINT originally by Masuharu Goto from HP Japan, which they have taken over see; &lt;a href="http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/cint" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://root.cern.ch/drupal/content/cint&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;for details on CINT see &lt;a href="http://root.cern.ch" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://root.cern.ch&lt;/a&gt; for information about ROOT itself.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fox</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 07:35:17 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/iccsh/#comment-63511128</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Open source Photosynth: PixelStruct 0.2 released</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/ziocO9_A4_0/</link><description>I am not an expert in QT,C/C++ and am trying to compile this project for last 3-4 days.&lt;br&gt;Are there any set of instructions to compile it. Also one should be expected to make &lt;br&gt;a visual studio solution or QT project?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kapoorvinny</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:44:34 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/2009/09/18/open-source-photosynth-pixelstruct-02-released/#comment-63502837</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Converting images to grayscale in Linux with ImageMagick</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/eE8BtP5LHvo/</link><description>Man Super!! You was the first in the Serps for my search, This command did the trick and got my images to Gray Scale! Thank you again!!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Max</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 23:01:46 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/2008/09/29/converting-images-to-grayscale-in-linux-with-imagemagick/#comment-57827489</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: LLJVM</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/cQxT65Z5KtU/</link><description>Thanks dude! This is just brilliant. Works like a charm with quite big old and complicated piece of a simulation software. Speed of execution is very impressive. This kind of solution opens totally new doors.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maku</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:09:00 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/lljvm/#comment-57099934</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Open source Photosynth: PixelStruct 0.2 released</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/fMJXoNchkaE/</link><description>Providing a deb package is on my TODO list. What error are you getting when trying to compile?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 04:44:38 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/2009/09/18/open-source-photosynth-pixelstruct-02-released/#comment-46497251</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: PixelStruct</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/07RFfRTwUoQ/</link><description>Sorry, for the moment you'll have to compile it from source (until I get around to providing a binary distribution)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 23:16:29 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/pixelstruct/#comment-46467740</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Open source Photosynth: PixelStruct 0.2 released</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/82iZUSgnzgo/</link><description>is there anyway that someone could please compile this in deb format.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; i have been trying for months to compile it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt; Im not a programmer but i would definitely love to use it since im primarily on ubuntu. Im shocked at the lack of posts anywhere on the net discussing its use</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ugliefrog</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:34:31 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/2009/09/18/open-source-photosynth-pixelstruct-02-released/#comment-46395772</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: PixelStruct</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/B6hmNIoAPDc/</link><description>Where can I get an executable of this? I would love to play around with this. Thanks and great work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Eric</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 03:29:46 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/pixelstruct/#comment-45457614</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: PixelStruct</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/9vP_GRwTcWM/</link><description>Congratulations  i hope this will be a good  alternative to the MS Photosynth ,but  free and open for Linux users. Thanks</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fabio</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 13:50:55 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/pixelstruct/#comment-32160083</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: LLJVM 0.2: C to JVM Bytecode Compiler</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/6MIZuQngw7s/</link><description>Currently only C, but potentially any LLVM frontend could be supported. I may look into adding support for C++ sometime in the future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidar</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 23:54:18 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/2009/12/31/lljvm-02-c-to-jvm-bytecode-compiler/#comment-30072480</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: LLJVM 0.2: C to JVM Bytecode Compiler</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/cyVR5UOVVew/</link><description>Can only handle C or any front end?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Luke</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 05:29:39 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/2009/12/31/lljvm-02-c-to-jvm-bytecode-compiler/#comment-30034018</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: PixelStruct</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/diwW0ysHAQc/</link><description>Works now!  Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 09:06:07 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/pixelstruct/#comment-29054131</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: PixelStruct</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/Mq8nCV_1zsU/</link><description>I've just committed a patch to the repository - let me know if this fixes the issue for you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidar</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:04:49 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/pixelstruct/#comment-29005467</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: PixelStruct</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/S9wffYypmdw/</link><description>I can get pixelstruct to compile fine on 64bit Ubuntu 9.10 but get the following error when I run it:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;jwerts@Ubuntles:~/applications/pixelstruct-0.2$ ./pixelstruct &lt;br&gt;terminate called after throwing an instance of 'CGAL::Assertion_exception'&lt;br&gt;  what():  CGAL ERROR: assertion violation!&lt;br&gt;Expr: -CGAL_IA_MUL(-1.1, 10.1) != CGAL_IA_MUL(1.1, 10.1)&lt;br&gt;File: /usr/include/CGAL/Interval_nt.h&lt;br&gt;Line: 154&lt;br&gt;Explanation: Wrong rounding: did you forget the -frounding-math option if you use GCC?&lt;br&gt;Aborted&lt;br&gt;jwerts@Ubuntles:~/applications/pixelstruct-0.2$&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Any ideas?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Josh</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 14:06:26 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/pixelstruct/#comment-28929256</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: PixelStruct</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/xvCWYRLFHJ0/</link><description>Awesome.&lt;br&gt;I, and many others, have been looking for this since I first saw photosynth.  The ability to select the view you want is very iimited as yet but I eager to watch development.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DJC</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 15:49:10 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/pixelstruct/#comment-27923523</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: LLJVM</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/pkmsH-lKrtM/</link><description>LLJVM has been featured at &lt;a href="http://LinuxLinks.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;LinuxLinks.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Emms</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 12:48:15 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/lljvm/#comment-27911962</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: LLJVM 0.2: C to JVM Bytecode Compiler</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/cIP5ia_AvzE/</link><description>Super cool!  Can't wait to see continued progress :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">openid-15868</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 23:15:49 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/2009/12/31/lljvm-02-c-to-jvm-bytecode-compiler/#comment-27869064</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: Converting videos to 3GP in Ubuntu Intrepid 8.10 with FFmpeg</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/qzKaBBIjvbA/</link><description>The command line that you showed did work just fine in my LinuxMint6 (with Ubuntu intrepid repositories) to conver from *.avi to *.3gp. I did not have to install all of the packages you showed in the first quote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the audio quality is just awesome, I've tried to convert this kind of video a couple times before with success, but this is really great. I'm really thankful.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wilson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 22:25:15 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/2009/02/28/converting-videos-to-3gp-in-ubuntu-intrepid-810-with-ffmpeg/#comment-26754298</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: PixelStruct</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/buuuOQxLuoE/</link><description>Fixed in revision 26.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:50:25 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/pixelstruct/#comment-25358168</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: LLJVM</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/72GjqF57yK0/</link><description>Probably, but in return there are advatages such as: C-Java interoperability without the use of JNI (especially important where JNI is not available: applets, Google App Engine, etc), better security (e.g. buffer overflows can't affect the outside system), etc. Also, if you're using a JVM implementation that employs JIT (e.g. HotSpot), then the performance loss shouldn't be too significant.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidar</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:34:28 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/lljvm/#comment-24119377</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: LLJVM</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/AXu28PTxm6s/</link><description>running C inside a JVM? I would think performance would suffer, no?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 02:01:35 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/lljvm/#comment-24118524</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: PixelStruct</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/CysOJ2SIZLI/</link><description>&lt;a href="http://code.google.com/p/pixelstruct/issues/detail?id=2" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://code.google.com/p/pixelstruct/issues/det...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidar</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:46:28 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/pixelstruct/#comment-23440176</feedburner:origLink></item><item><title>Re: PixelStruct</title><link>http://feeds.da.vidr.cc/~r/DavidRobertsComments/~3/OMkmU55aSvo/</link><description>I like to see this project is still being developed.I like Photosynth and all, but I'd rather not have to surrender my photos to Microsoft. And silverlight is just horrendous to try and install on Linux. Keep up the good work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wade</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:48:47 -0000</pubDate><feedburner:origLink>http://da.vidr.cc/projects/pixelstruct/#comment-22449820</feedburner:origLink></item></channel></rss>
